New age in Tatarstan (2008)

We all remember and know about the ban on a number of book publications that were classified as extremist.  And we remember very well the statement of the first deputy of the Spiritual Muslim Board of the Republic of Tatarstan, Valiulla Yakupov, about the advice to burn books of similar content.  The provocation on his part was a success, the entire so-called progressive Mullin and intelligentsia community unanimously accused him of following fascist examples.  In fact, the examples are not only fascist, but rather medieval.  And religion, for the most part, was formed as a systemic whole in this era.  And the most interesting thing is that according to Sharia it is recommended to burn books where there is the name of Allah.  By the way, proceeding from the fact not to desecrate the sacred records.  In this case, speech is generally practically prohibited in our country for the distribution of literature, which, not according to the court, but according to expert assessments, is considered extremist.  Moreover, the organizations that printed this literature are considered extremist.  Why such agility in protecting extremists, in fact, from statements of that kind.  Yes, very simple.  Everyone who participates in criticism, except for this literature, did not read anything else in Russian.  In fact, they are the very ones with whom our valiant power structures are fighting.  But unfortunately they fight slowly and reluctantly.

 By the way, the same Valiulla at one time also produced and distributed similar literature.  It was in the distant 90s, when there was no other literature.  Now it is far from the 90s and there is alternative literature, but no, that one is better.  She after all on sponsor's money and for big money.  And most importantly, when you find out the price of the issue, you begin to understand why the power structures are on good terms with this community and why the power structures are inert.  everything is just money and nothing personal.  Yes, I understand that going too far with regard to literature is more expensive for yourself.  And few people read this literature.  Recruitment or agitation or dagvat goes through personal communication, and not through literature, and it is useless to put censors here.  The decision to prohibit only distribution does not solve the problem either.  But if this decision exists, it is already a law, and whoever does not want to comply with the law is a criminal.  Law is law.  And to burn or not to burn is just an excuse to remove the objectionable who does not go along with ...... in step.